Possibility of identifying plant components of the diet of Harpalus rufipes (Coleoptera, Carabidae) by visual evaluation

  • D. Y. Reshetniak Oles Honchar Dnipro National University
  • O. Y. Pakhomov Oles Honchar Dnipro National University
  • V. V. Brygadyrenko Oles Honchar Dnipro National University http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9448-8232
Keywords: intestinal content, ground beetles, digestion, starch, mixed phytophages

Abstract

Harpalus rufipes (De Geer, 1774) is a trans-palearctic, polyzonal, habitat generalist species, which is usually the most numerous ground beetle species in agricultural ecosystems and forest plantations. In laboratory conditions, 50 H. rufipes imagoes were placed in separate containers, each individual being fed over several days with seeds of a single species of plant, the total number of plant species being ten. Then the content of the beetles’ intestine were analyzed using Lugol’s iodine stain for visualizing starch granules. Native agents of ground seeds of plants and also of seeds treated by a fermentative agent from a mammalian pancreas were used for control. Granules of starch from seeds of Triticum aestivum L., Hordeum vulgare L. and Secale cereale L. were only insignificantly broken down by enzymes in the intestines of H. rufipes. The starch granules of Avena sativa L., Panicum miliaceum L., Sorghum drummondii (Steud.) Millsp. and Chase, Fagopyrum esculentum Moench and Sinapis arvensis L. were also insignificantly affected in the beetles’ intestine compared to the agent affected by enzymes of vertebrate animals. Starch granules of Beta vulgaris L. seeds affected by the enzymes became deformed and fragmented. Sometimes only their fragments remained. Seeds with a high content of fats such as seeds of Juglans regia L. were digested poorly in the intestine of H. rufipes (drops of fat could be seen surrounding certain food particles, which obstructed their digestion). The results of microscopic study of the intestinal content of mixed phytophage ground beetles of agricultural environments will help in identifying mechanisms of regulation of trophic chains by polyphage species, and will help advance the study of gregarine infection rates among ground beetles. 

References

Arráiz, H., Barbarin, N., Pasturel, M., Beaufort, L., Domínguez-Rodrigo, M., & Barboni, D. (2016). Starch granules identification and automatic classificati on based on an extended set of morphometric and optical measurements. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 7, 169–179.

Bet, C. D., do Prado Cordoba, L., Ribeiro, L. S., & Schnitzler, E. (2016). Com mon vetch (Vicia sativa) as a new starch source: Its thermal, rheological and structural properties after acid hydrolysis. Food Biophysics, 11(3), 275–282.

Bohan, D. A., Boursault, A., Brooks, D. R., & Petit, S. (2011). National-scale regulation of the weed seedbank by carabid predators. Journal of Applied Ecology, 48(4), 888–898.

Briggs, J. B. (1965). Biology of some ground beetles (Col., Carabidae) injurious to strawberries. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 56(1), 79–93.

Brygadyrenko, V. V. (2015). Community structure of litter invertebrates of forest belt ecosystems in the Ukrainian steppe zone. International Journal of Environmental Research, 9(4), 1183–1192.

Brygadyrenko, V. V. (2016). The influence of moisture conditions on the structure of litter invertebrate communities in shelterbelt and plantation forests in Southern Ukraine. Journal of Bio-Science, 22, 77–88.

Brygadyrenko, V. V., & Reshetniak, D. Y. (2014a). Morphological variability among populations of Harpalus rufipes (Coleoptera, Carabidae): What is more important – the mean values or statistical pecularities of distribution in the population? Folia Oecologica, 41(2), 109–133.

Brygadyrenko, V. V., & Reshetniak, D. Y. (2014b). Trophic preferences of Har palus rufipes (Coleoptera, Carabidae) with regard to seeds of agricultural crops in conditions of laboratory experiment. Baltic Journal of Coleoptero logy, 14(2), 179–190.

Brygadyrenko, V. V., & Reshetniak, D. Y. (2016). Morphometric variability of Clitellocephalus ophoni (Eugregarinida, Gregarinidae) in the intestines of Harpalus rufipes (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Archives of Biological Scien ces, 68(3), 587–601.

Churchfield, S., Hollier, J., & Brown, V. K. (1991). The effects of small mam mal predators on grassland invertebrates, investigated by field exclosure experiment. Oikos, 60(3), 283–290.

Currie, C. R., Spence, J. R., & Niemela, J. (1996). Competition, cannibalism and intraguild predation among ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae): A la boratory study. Coleopterists Bulletin, 50(2), 135–148.

Davies, M. I. (1953). The contents of the crops of some British carabid beetles. Entomologist’s Monthly Magazine, 89, 18–23.

Dziadek, K., Kopeć, A., Pastucha, E., Piątkowska, E., Leszczyńska, T., Pisu lewska, E., Witkowicz, R., & Francik, R. (2016). Basic chemical composi tion and bioactive compounds content in selected cultivars of buckwheat whole seeds, dehulled seeds and hulls. Journal of Cereal Science, 69, 1–8.

Faly, L. I., & Brygadyrenko, V. V. (2014). Patterns in the horizontal structure of litter invertebrate communities in windbreak plantations in the steppe zone of the Ukraine. Journal of Plant Protection Research, 54(4), 414–420.

Faly, L. I., Kolombar, T. M., Prokopenko, E. V., Pakhomov, O. Y., & Bryga dyrenko, V. V. (2017). Structure of litter macrofauna communities in poplar plantations in an urban ecosystem in Ukraine. Biosystems Diversity, 25(1), 29–38.

Fawki, S., & Toft, S. (2005). Food preferences and the value of animal food for the carabid beetle Amara similata (Gyll.) (Col., Carabidae). Journal of Applied Entomology, 129, 551–556.

Frеudе, H., Hardе, K.-W., & Lohsе, G. A. (2004). Diе Kafеr Мittеlеuropas. Band 2. Adеphaga. 1. Сarabidaе (Laufkafеr). Elsеviеr Gmbh, Spеktrum Akadеmisсhеr Vеrlag, Неidеlbеrg.

Harrison, S., & Gallandt, E. R. (2012). Behavioural studies of Harpalus rufipes De Geer: An important weed seed predator in Northeastern US agroecosystems. International Journal of Ecology, 2012, 1–6.

Hartke, A., Drummond, F. A., & Liebman, M. (1998). Seed feeding, seed caching, and burrowing behaviors of Harpalus rufipes De Geer larvae (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in the Maine potato agroecosystem. Biological Control, 13(2), 91–100.

Honek, A., Martinkova, Z., & Jarosik, V. (2003). Ground beetles (Carabidae) as seed predators. European Journal of Entomology, 100(4), 531–544.

Hurka, K. (1996). Carabidae of the Czech and Slovak Republics. Kabourek, Zlin.

Kataev, B. M., & Liang, H. (2015). Taxonomic review of Chinese species of ground beetles of the subgenus Pseudoophonus (genus Harpalus) (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Zootaxa, 3920(1), 1–39.

Klimeš, P., & Saska, P. (2009). Larval and adult seed consumption affected by the degree of food specialization in Amara (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Journal of Applied Entomology, 134(8), 659–666.

Korolev, О. V., & Brygadyrenko, V. V. (2014). Influence of individual variation in the trophic spectra of Pterostichus melanarius (Coleoptera, Carabidae) on the adaptation possibilities of its population. Folia Oecologica, 41(1), 34–43.

Kryzhanovskij, O. L., Belousov, I. A., Kabak, I. I., Kataev, B. M., Makarov, K. V., & Shilenkov, V. G. (1995). A checklist of the ground-beetles of Russia and adjacent lands (Insecta, Coleoptera, Carabidae). Sofia-Mos cow, Pensoft Publishers.

Lindroth, C. H. (1986). The Carabidae (Coleoptera) of Fennoscandia and Denmark. Fauna Entomologica Scandinavica, 15(2), 233–497.

Matalin, A. V. (2007). Typology of life cycles of ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in Western Palaearctic. Entomological Review, 87(8), 947–972.

Midtgaard, F. (1999). Is dispersal density-dependent in carabid beetles? A field experiment with Harpalus rufipes (Degeer) and Pterostichus niger (Schaller) (Col., Carabidae). Journal of Applied Entomology, 123(1), 9–12.

Monzó, C., Sabater-Muñoz, B., Urbaneja, A., & Castañera, P. (2011). The ground beetle Pseudophonus rufipes revealed as predator of Ceratitis capitata in citrus orchards. Biological Control, 56(1), 17–21.

Porhajašova, J., Petřvalsky, V., Macak, M., & Urminska, J. (2009). Occurrence of species family Carabidae (Coleoptera) indepence on the input of organic matter into soil. Journal of Central European Agriculture, 9(3), 557–565.

Reshetniak, D. Y., & Brygadyrenko, V. V. (2013). Optimizacija raciona Harpalus rufipes (Coleoptera, Carabidae) v uslovijakh laboratornogo soderzhanija [Optimizing of Harpalus rufipes (Coleoptera, Carabidae) diet under laboratory conditions]. Visnyk of Dnipropetrovsk University. Biology, Ecology, 21(1), 38–42 (in Russian).

Reshetnyak, D. Y. (2015). Sezonnaja dinamika zarazhennosti Harpalus rufipes (Coleoptera, Carabidae) gregarinami v agrojekosisteme [Seasonal dynamic of the occurrence of the gregarines infection of Harpalus rufipes (Coleo ptera, Carabidae) in agroecosystem]. Visnyk of Dnipropetrovsk Univer sity. Biology, Ecology, 23(2), 149–153 (in Russian).

Saska, P., Martinkova, Z., & Honek, A. (2010). Temperature and rate of seed con sumption by ground beetles (Carabidae). Biological Control, 52(2), 91–95.

Shearin, A. F., Reberg-Horton, C. S., & Gallandt, E. R. (2008). Cover crop effects on the activity-density of the weed seed predator Harpalus rufipes (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Weed Science, 56(3), 442–450.

Thiele, H.-U. (1977). Carabid beetles in their environments. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

Thomas, C. F. G., Parkinson, L., Griffiths, G. J. K., Garcia, A. F., & Marshall, E. J. P. (2001). Aggregation and temporal stability of carabid beetle distributions in field and hedgerow habitats. Journal of Applied Ecology, 38(1), 100–116.

Zhang, J., Drummond, F. A., Liebman, M., & Hartke, A. (1997). Phenology and dispersal of Harpalus rufipes De Geer (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in agroecosystems in Maine. Journal of Agricultural and Urban Entomology, 14(2), 171–186.

Published
2017-08-15
How to Cite
Reshetniak, D. Y., Pakhomov, O. Y., & Brygadyrenko, V. V. (2017). Possibility of identifying plant components of the diet of Harpalus rufipes (Coleoptera, Carabidae) by visual evaluation. Regulatory Mechanisms in Biosystems, 8(3), 377-383. https://doi.org/10.15421/021758

Most read articles by the same author(s)