Evaluation of genetic diversity and relationships among eight Russian and Ukrainian cattle breeds based on microsatellite markers

Keywords: microsatellite DNA loci; genetic diversity; dairy and meat cattle breeds.

Abstract

In recent years, special attention has been paid both to the preservation of the genetic diversity of cattle breeds in the Russian Federation and Ukraine, and to the evaluation of the breeds’ ‘purity’, especially in relation to undesirable recessive lethal mutations. The main goal of our work was to assess the genetic diversity of the main cattle breeds bred in the Russian Federation and Ukraine using microsatellite DNA loci, as well as to evaluate the phylogenetic relationships between them. An analysis of molecular genetic diversity was carried out in different cattle breeds represented both in the Russian Federation and Ukraine. A total of 752 individuals, which belonged to eight breeds of the dairy and meat productivity directions were studied. Ten microsatellite loci recommended by ISAG-FAO and arranged in one multiplex panel (ETH3, INRA023, TGLA227, BM1818, TGLA122, SPS115, TGLA53, BM2113, BM1824 and ETH10) were used as DNA markers. Some alleles were found with a very high frequency in most of the studied cattle breeds and, thus, they can be considered as species-specific for the species Bos taurus as a whole. These were alleles 262 and 266 bp (for BM1818), 180 and 188 bp (for BM1824), 125-127 and 133-135 bp (for BM2113), 217-219 bp (for ETH10), 248 and 252 bp (for SPS115). All breeds included in the analysis are characterized by a very high genetic uniqueness based on microsatellite loci; the accuracy of assigning the studied individuals to their own population varied within the range of 95–100%. In general, all breeds studied are grouped into two clusters. Cluster No. 1 contains genetic groups originating from Holstein, and cluster No. 2 contains the remaining breeds. Three breeds (Ayrshire, Simmental and Russian Red Pied) are characterized by very low estimates of the effective population size (less than 50 animals), which may lead to the loss of their genetic uniqueness in the future. In the study of eight dairy and meat cattle breeds that are bred in the Russian Federation and Ukraine, we found that the breeds differ significantly in the genetic polymorphism indicators over ten MS-DNA loci used. Moreover, the level of allelic diversity for the studied breeds was determined, primarily, by the presence and number of rare (and/or “private”) alleles. This may be due to the manifestation of different mechanisms of the formation and maintenance of genetic polymorphism in breeds, based on productivity direction.

References

Carolino, N., & Gama, L. T. (2008). Indicators of genetic erosion in an endangerred population: The Alentejana cattle breed in Portugal. Journal of Animal Science, 86(1), 47–56.

Choroszy, B., Janik, A., Choroszy, Z., & Zabek, T. (2006). Polymorphism of selected microsatellite DNA sequences in Simmental cattle chosen for identification of QTLs for meat traits. Animal Science Papers and Reports, 24(Suppl. 2), 71–77.

Dalvit, C., De Marchi, M., Dal Zotto, R., Zanetti, E., Meuwissen, T., & Cassandro, M. (2008). Genetic characterization of the Burlina cattle breed using microsatellites markers. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 125(2), 137–144.

Do, C., Waples, R. S., Peel, D., Macbeth, G. M., Tillett, B. J., & Ovenden, J. R. (2014). NeEstimator v2: re-implementation of software for the estimation of contemporary effective population size (Ne) from genetic data. Molecular Ecology Resources, 14(1), 209–214.

Dunin, I., Dankvert, A., & Kochetkov, A. (2013). Perspektivy razvitiya molochnogo skotovodstva i konkurentosposobnost’ molochnogo skota, razvodimogo v Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Prospects for further development of dairy cattle breeding and competitiveness of dairy cattle in the Russian Federation]. Journal of Dairy and Beef Cattle Farming, 3, 1–5 (in Russian).

Gladiy, M. V., Ruban, S. Y., Getya, A. A., & Pryima, S. V. (2015). Porody sil’s’kohospodars’kykh tvaryn Ukrayiny. Istoriya, stan, perspektyvy rozvytku [Breeds of farm animals in Ukraine. History, state, development prospects]. Animal Breeding and Genetics, 49, 44–57 (in Ukrainian).

Gorelov, P. V., Kol’tsov, D. N., Zinovieva, N. A., & Gladyr’, E. A. (2011). Sravnitel’nyy analiz grupp krovi i mikrosatellitov v kharakteristike novykh tipov skota buroy shvitskoy i sychevskoy porod [The comparative analysis of blood groups and microsatellites in characteristics of new cattle types of Swiss and Sychevskaja breeds]. Agricultural Biology, 6, 37–41.

Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. A., & Ryan, P. D. (2001). PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica, 4(1), 9.

Kiselyova, T. Y., Podoba, B. Y., Zabludovskiy, Y. Y., Terletskiy, V. P., Vorobyev, N. I., & Kantanen, J. (2010). Analiz 30 mikrosatellitnykh markerov u shesti lokal’nykh populyatsiy krupnogo rogatogo skota [The analysis of 30 microsatellite markers in six local cattle populations]. Agricultural Biology, 6, 20–25 (in Russian).

Kramarenko, A. S., Karatieieva, O. I., Lykhach, A. V., Lugovoy, S. I., Lykhach, V. Y., Pidpala, T. V., Patryeva, L. S., & Kramarenko, S. S. (2019). Assessing genomic taurine/zebuine admixture in the southern meat cattle based on microsatellite markers. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 9(1), 251–261.

Labinov, V. V., & Prokhorenko, P. N. (2015). Modernizatsiya cherno-pestroy porody krupnogo rogatogo skota v Rossii na osnove ispol’zovaniya genofonda golshtinov [Upgrading black-and-white cattle breed in Russia on the basis of the Holstein gene pool]. Dairy and Beef Cattle Farming, 1, 2–7 (in Russian).

Leroy, G., Mary-Huard, T., Verrier, E., Danvy, S., Charvolin, E., & Danchin-Burge, C. (2013). Methods to estimate effective population size using pedigree data: Examples in dog, sheep, cattle and horse. Genetics Selection Evolution, 45(1), 1.

Maiwashe, A., Nephawe, K. A., van der Westhuizen, R. R., Mostert, B. E., & Theron, H. E. (2006). Rate of inbreeding and effective population size in four major South African dairy cattle breeds. South African Journal of Animal Science, 36(1), 50–57.

McParland, S., Kearney, J. F., Rath, M., & Berry, D. P. (2007). Inbreeding trends and pedigree analysis of Irish dairy and beef cattle populations. Journal of Animal Science, 85(2), 322–331.

Nei, M. (1972). Genetic distance between populations. The American Naturalist, 106(949), 283–292.

Nomura, T., Honda, T., & Mukai, F. (2001). Inbreeding and effective population size of Japanese Black cattle. Journal of Animal Science, 79(2), 366–370.

Peakall, R., & Smouse, P. E. (2012). GenAIEx 6.5: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research – An update. Bioinformatics, 28(19), 2537–2539.

Pritchard, J. K., Stephens, M., & Donnelly, P. (2000). Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics, 155(2), 945–959.

Prokhorenko, P. (2013). Golshtinskaya poroda i ee vliyanie na geneticheskiy progress produktivnosti cherno-pestrogo skota evropeyskikh stran i Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Holstein breed and its influence to genetic progress of black-and-white cattle performance in European countries and the Russian Federation]. Journal of Dairy and Beef Cattle Farming, 2, 2–6 (in Russian).

Putnova, L., Vrtkova, I., Srubarova, P., & Stehlik, L. (2011). Utilization of a 17 microsatellites set for bovine traceability in Czech cattle populations. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science, 1(1), 31–37.

Rousset, F. (2008). GENEPOP’007: A complete re-implementation of the GENEPOP software for Windows and Linux. Molecular Ecology Resources, 8(1), 103–106.

Scraggs, E., Zanella, R., Wojtowicz, A., Taylor, J. F., Gaskins, C. T., Reeves, J. J., de Avila, J. M., & Neibergs, H. L. (2014). Estimation of inbreeding and effective population size of full-blood wagyu cattle registered with the American Wagyu Cattle Association. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 131(1), 3–10.

Shelyov, A. V., Kopylov, K. V., Kramarenko, S. S., & Kramarenko, O. S. (2017). Analysis of population-genetic processes in different cattle breeds by microsatellite loci of DNA. Agricultural Science and Practice, 4(1), 74–78.

Sölkner, J., Filipcic, L., & Hampshire, N. (1998). Genetic variability of populations and similarity of subpopulations in Austrian cattle breeds determined by analysis of pedigrees. Animal Science, 67(2), 249–256.

Stevanović, J., Stanimirović, Z., Dimitrijević, V., Stojić, V., Fratrić, N., & Lazarević, M. (2009). Microsatellite DNA polymorphism and its usefulness for pedigree verification in Simmental cattle from Serbia. Acta Veterinaria, 59(5–6), 621–631.

Zinovieva, N. A., Gladyr, E. A., Bagirov, V. A., & Brem, G. (2015). Dinamika bioraznoobraziya cherno-pestrogo skota pod vozdeistviem krossbridinga [Dynamics of the biodiversity of black and white cattle influenced by cross-breeding]. Vavilov Journal of Genetics and Breeding, 19(2), 222–225 (in Russian).

Published
2019-10-20
How to Cite
Snegin, E. A., Kramarenko, A. S., Snegina, E. A., & Kramarenko, S. S. (2019). Evaluation of genetic diversity and relationships among eight Russian and Ukrainian cattle breeds based on microsatellite markers . Regulatory Mechanisms in Biosystems, 10(4), 388-393. https://doi.org/10.15421/021958