Assessment of ecological stability in yield for breeding of spring barley cultivars with increased adaptive potential

  • V. M. Hudzenko The V. M. Remeslo Myronivka Institute of Wheat of National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine
  • O. A. Demydov The V. M. Remeslo Myronivka Institute of Wheat of National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine
  • V. P. Kavunets The V. M. Remeslo Myronivka Institute of Wheat of National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine
  • L. M. Kachan Bila Tserkva National Agrarian University
  • V. A. Ishchenko Institute of Agriculture of Steppe of National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine
  • M. O. Sardak Nosivka Plant Breeding and Experimental Station of the V. M. Remeslo Myronivka Institute of Wheat of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine
Keywords: Hordeum vulgare; yield; multi-environment trial; additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI); genotype main effects plus genotype by environment interaction (GGE).

Abstract

Increasing crop adaptability in terms of ensuring a stable level of productivity in the genotype – environment interaction is still the central problem of plant breeding theory and practice. The aim of the present study is to theoretically substantiate and practically test a scheme of multi-environment trials, as well as interpret experimental data using modern statistical tools for evaluation of the genotype by environment interaction, and highlight the best genotypes with combining yield performance and ecological stability at the final stage of the spring barley breeding process. For this purpose in the first year of competitive testing (2016) at the V. M. Remeslo Myronivka Institute of Wheat of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine we selected nine promising spring barley breeding lines. In 2017 and 2018 these breeding lines were additionally tested in two other scientific institutions located in different agroclimatic zones of Ukraine. For a more reliable assessment, the breeding lines were compared not only with standard cultivar, but also with ten spring barley cultivars widespread in agricultural production of Ukraine. Thus, for three years of competitive testing, we received experimental genotype-environmental data from seven environments, which represent a combination of contrasting agroclimatic zones (Central part of the Forest-Steppe, Polissia and Northern Steppe of Ukraine) and different years (2016–2018). Our results revealed significant variability of mean yield of genotypes, as well as cross-over genotype by environment interaction. The first two principal components of both AMMI and GGE biplot explained more than 80% of the genotype by environment interaction. In general, the peculiarities we revealed indicate the effectiveness of the proposed combination of spatial (agroclimatic zones) and temporal (years) gradients to identify the best spring barley genotypes with the optimal combination of yield performance and ecological stability. Using AMMI and GGE biplot models was effective for the comprehensive differentiation of genotypes in terms of wide and specific adaptability, as well as for qualitative characterization of test environments and providing mega-environment analysis. As a practical result of the multi-environment trial, four spring barley breeding lines have been submitted to the State Variety Testing of Ukraine as new cultivars MIP Sharm, MIP Tytul, MIP Deviz and MIP Zakhysnyk, respectively.

References

Abtew, W. G., Lakew, B., Haussmann, B. I. G., & Schmid, K. J. (2015). Ethiopian barley landraces show higher yield stability and comparable yield to improved varieties in multi-environment field trials. Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science, 7(8), 275–291.

Al-Ghzawi, A. L. A., Al-Ajlouni, Z. I., Al Sane, K. O., Bsoul, E. Y., Musallam, I., Khalaf, Y. B., Al-Hajaj, N., Al-Tawaha, A. R., Aldwairi, Y., & Al-Saqqar, H. (2019). Yield stability and adaptation of four spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars under rainfed conditions. Research on Crops, 20(1), 10–18.

Al-Sayaydeh, R., Al-Bawalize, A., Al-Ajlouni, Z., Akash, M. W., Abu-Elenein, J., & Al-Abdallat, A. M. (2019). Agronomic evaluation and yield performance of selected barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) landraces from Jordan. International Journal of Agronomy, 2019, 9575081.

Anbessa, Y., Juskiw, P., Good, A., Nyachiro, J., & Helm, J. (2010). Selection efficiency across environments in improvement of barley yield for moderately low nitrogen environments. Crop Science, 50(2), 451–457.

Bilgin, O., Balkan, A., Korkut, Z. K., & Başer, İ. (2018). Multi-environmental evaluation of triticale, wheat and barley genotypes by GGE biplot analysis. Journal of Life Sciences, 12, 13–23.

Bocianowski, J., Warzecha, T., Nowosad, K., & Bathelt, R. (2019). Genotype by environment interaction using AMMI model and estimation of additive and epistasis gene effects for 1000-kernel weight in spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Journal of Applied Genetics, 60, 127–135.

Ceccarelli, S. (1996). Adaptation to low/high input cultivation. Euphytica, 92(1–2), 203–214.

Fana, G., Tadese, D., Sebsibe, H., & Verma, R. P. S. (2018). Multi-environment trial analysis of food barley in Ethiopia using AMMI and GGE biplot methods. Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics, 6(3), 75–85.

Frutos, E., Galindo, M. P., & Leiva, V. (2014). An interactive biplot implementation in R for modeling genotype-by-environment interaction. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 28, 1629–1641.

Gabriel, K. R. (1971). The biplot graphic display of matrices with application to principal component analysis. Biometrica, 58(3), 453–467.

Gauch, H. G., Piepo, H.-P., & Annicchiarico, P. (2008). Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE: Further consideration. Crop Science, 48(3), 866–889.

Godfray, H. C. J., Beddington, J. R., Crute, I. R., Haddad, L., Lawrece, D., Muir, J. F., Pretty, J., Robinson, S., Thomas, S. M., & Toulmin, C. (2010). Food security: The challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science, 327(5967), 812–818.

Gollob, H. F. (1968). A statistical model which combines feature of factor analytic and analysis of variance techniques. Psychometrika, 33, 73–115.

Gudzenko, V. N. (2019). Statisticheskaya i graficheskaya (GGE biplot) ocenka adaptivnoj sposobnosti i stabilnosti selekcionnyh linij yachmenya ozimogo [Statistical and graphical (GGE biplot) evaluation of the adaptive ability and stability of winter barley breeding lines]. Vavilov Journal of Genetics and Breeding, 23(1), 110–118 (in Russian).

Hill, J. (1975). Genotype-environment interaction – a challenge for plant breeding. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 85(3), 477–493.

Hongyu, K., Garcia-Pena, M., de Araujo, L. B., & dos Santos Dias, C. T. (2014). Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI analysis of genotype x environment interaction. Biometrical Letters, 51(2), 89–102.

Hudzenko, V. M., Vasylkivskyi, S. P., Demydov, O. A., Polishchuk, T. P., & Babiy, O. O. (2017). Selektsiia yachmeniu yaroho na pidvyshchennia produktyvnoho ta adaptyvnoho potentsialu [Spring barley breeding for increase in productive and adaptive capacities]. Plant Breeding and Seed Production, 111, 51–61 (in Ukrainian).

Kendal, E., Karaman, M., Tekdal, S., & Doğan, S. (2019). Analysis of promising barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) lines performance by AMMI and GGE biplot in multiple traits and environment. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 17(2), 5219–5233.

Liviero, L., Maestri, E., Gulli, M., Nevo, E., & Marmiroli, N. (2002). Ecogeographic adaptation and genetic variation in wild barley, application of molecular markers targeted to environmentally regulated genes. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 49(2), 133–144.

Malosetti, M., Ribaut, J.-M., & van Eeuwijk, F. A. (2013). The statistical analysis of multi-environment data: modeling genotype-by-environment interaction and its genetic basis. Frontiers in Physiology, 4, 44.

Marukhnyak, A. Y. (2018). Ocenka adaptivnyh osobennostej sortov yarovogo yachmenya [Evaluation of adaptive ability of spring barley varieties]. Bulletin of the Belarussian State Agricultural Academy, 1, 67–72 (in Russian).

Mehari, M., Alamerew, S., & Lakew, B. (2014). Genotype × environment interaction and yield stability of malt barley genotypes evaluated in Tigray, Ethiopia using the AMMI analysis. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 13(2), 73–79.

Mirosavljević, M., Pržulj, N., Boćanski, J., Stanisavljević, D., & Mitrović, B. (2014). The application of AMMI model for barley cultivars evaluation in multi-year trials. Genetika, 46, 445–454.

Moore, F. C., & Lobell, D. B. (2015). The fingerprint of climate trends on European crop yields. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(9), 2670–2675.

Namorato, H., Miranda, G. V., de Souza, L. V., Oliviera, L. R., DeLima, R. O., & Mantovani, E. E. (2009). Comparing biplot multivariate analyses with Eberhart and Russell’ method for genotype × environment interaction. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, 9(4), 299–307.

Pereira, D. G., Rodrigues, P. C., Mejza, S., & Mexia, J. T. (2012). A comparison between joint regression analysis and the AMMI model: A case study with barley. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 82(2), 193–207.

Pržulj, N., & Momčilović, V. (2012). Spring barley performances in the Pannonian zone. Genetika, 44, 499–512.

Pržulj, N., Mirosavljević, M., Čanak, P., Zorić, M., & Boćanski, J. (2015). Evaluation of spring barley performance by biplot analysis. Cereal Researh Communications, 43(4), 692–703.

Pswarayi, A., van Eeuwijk, F. A., Ceccarelli, S., Grando, S., Comadran, J., Russell, J. R., Pecchioni, N., Tondelli, A., Akar, T., Al-Yassin, A., Benbelcacem, A., Ouabbou, H., Thomas, W. T. B., & Romagosa, I. (2008). Changes in allele frequencies in landraces, old and modern barley cultivars of marker loci close to QTL for grain yield under high and low input conditions. Euphytica, 163(3), 435–447.

Ray, D. K., Mueller, N. D., West, P. C., & Foley, J. A. (2013). Yield trends are insufficient to double global crop production by 2050. PLoS One, 8(6), e66428.

Smith, P., & Gregory, P. J. (2013). Climate change and sustainable food production. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 72(1), 21–28.

Solonechnyi, P., Kozachenko, M., Vasko, N., Gudzenko, V., Ishenko, V., Kozelets, G., Usova, N., Logvinenko, Y., & Vinukov, A. (2018). AMMI and GGE biplot analysis of yield performance of spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) varieties in multi environment trials. Agriculture and Forestry, 64(1), 121–132.

Solonechnyi, P., Vasko, N., Naumov, A., Solonechnaya, O., Vazhenina, O., Bondareva, O., & Logvinenko, Y. (2015). GGE biplot analysis of genotype by environment interaction of spring barley varieties. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture, 102(4), 431–436.

Tilman, D., Balzer, C., Hill, J., & Befort, B. L. (2011). Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(50), 20260–20264.

Ullrich, S. E. (Ed.). (2011). Barley: Production, improvement, and uses. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester.

Vaezi, B., Pour-Aboughadareh, A., Mohammadi, R., Armion, M., Mehraban, A., Hossein-Pour, T., & Dorii, M. (2017). GGE biplot and AMMI analysis of barley yield performance in Iran. Cereal Research Communication, 45(3), 500–511.

van Eeuwijk, F. A., Bustos-Korts, D. V., & Malosetti, M. (2016). What should students in plant breeding know about the statistical aspects of genotype × environment interactions? Crop Science, 56(5), 2119–2140.

van Oosterom, E. J., & Acevedo, E. (1992). Adaptation of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) to harsh Mediterranean environments III. Plant ideotype and grain yield. Euphytica, 62(1), 29–38.

Verma, A., Kumar, V., Kharab, A. S., & Singh, G. P. (2019). AMMI model to estimate G × E for grain yield of dual purpose barley genotypes. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 8(5), 1–7.

von Korff, M., Grando, S., Del Greco, A., This, D., Baum, M., & Ceccarelli, S. (2008). Quantitative trait loci associated with adaptation to Mediterranean dryland conditions in barley. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 117(5), 653–669.

Yan, W., & Tinker, N. A. (2006). Biplot analysis of multi-environment trial data: Principles and applications. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 86(3), 623–645.

Yan, W., Kang, M. S., Ma, B., Woods, S., & Cornelius, P. L. (2007). GGE biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype-by-environment data. Crop Science, 47, 641–653.

Zhao, F., & Xu, S. (2012). Genotype by environment interaction of quantitative traits: A case study in barley. G3, Genes, Genomes, Genetics, 2(7), 779–788.

Zhuchenko, A. A. (1988). Adaptivnyj potencial kulturnyh rastenij (ekologo-geneticheskie osnovy) [Adaptive potential of cultivated plants (genetic and ecological bases)]. Shtiintsa Publishers, Kishinev (in Russian).

Published
2020-04-23
How to Cite
Hudzenko, V. M., Demydov, O. A., Kavunets, V. P., Kachan, L. M., Ishchenko, V. A., & Sardak, M. O. (2020). Assessment of ecological stability in yield for breeding of spring barley cultivars with increased adaptive potential . Regulatory Mechanisms in Biosystems, 11(3), 425-430. https://doi.org/10.15421/022065