Morphofunctional features of the esophageal tonsil in some wild and domestic bird species

  • V. Т. Khomich National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine
  • S. І. Usenko National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine
  • N. V. Dyshliuk National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine
Keywords: esophageal tonsil; lymphoid tissue; lymphoid nodules; lymphoid cells; CD-markers; birds.

Abstract

It is well known that the esophageal tonsil belongs to the peripheral immune system of birds. Its functional basis is formed by lymphoid tissue, in which, under the influence of antigens, lymphocytes differentiate into effector cells, causing specific immunity. Material for histological research was selected from adults of 18 species of wild and domestic birds, belonging to 6 orders. When performing the experiment, the classical methods of staining histopreparations with hematoxylin and eosin, according to Mallory, Van Gieson, were used and impregnated with argentic nitrate according to Kelemen. The object for cytological, electron microscopic and immunohistochemical studies was the esophageal tonsil of G. gallus. In the course of this work it was demonstrated that the esophageal tonsil is located in the mucous membrane and submucosa of the junction between the caudal part of the esophagus and the glandular stomach (proventriculus). Most of the examined bird species (Galliformes – G. gallus, N. meleagris, C. coturnix, M. gallopavo, P. colchicus, B. bonasia, P. сrictatus; Anseriformes – A. platyrhynchos, A. anser, B. сanadensis; Passeriformes – P. рica, C. сornix; Ciconiiformes – C. ciconia) have an esophageal tonsil which was detected macroscopically. It has an annular shape, a plicated and uneven surface with holes of crypts and light pink colour. Its size is different in the birds of the studied species. It was recorded that the greatest length is in B. canadensis and C. ciconia, and the smallest is in C. coturnix and Р. pіса, the maximum width is in A. platyrhynchos, and the minimum width is in P. pica and C. cornix. In L. lagopus (Galliformes), G. glandarius (Passeriformes), G. сhloropus, F. аtra (Gruiformes) and C. livia (Columbiformes) the esophageal tonsil is not macroscopically visible. Most birds of the examined species have tonsils apposing directly with the glandular part of the stomach. Only A. anser and B. canadensis have a transition zone between them, the morphology of which differs from that of the tonsils and the glandular part of the stomach. Lymphoid tissue in birds of most species is represented by all levels of structural organization. It occupies the largest area in the tonsil of A. platyrhynchos and the smallest in L. lagopus. The area of lymphoid tissue and its location are different in the birds of the examined species. According to this criterion it is proposed to classify the tonsils into compact and diffuse ones. Reticular cells, lymphocytes, immunoblasts, plasma cells, monocytes and macrophages have been identified in lymphoid tissue of esophageal tonsil of G. gallus. Among the lymphocytes their subpopulations were found that respond to monoclonal antibodies with markers CD4+, CD8+ and CD20+. CD34+cells were not found in the tonsil.

References

Al-Juboury, R., Daoud, H., & Al-Arajy, A. (2016). Comparative anatomical, histological and histochemical studies of the oesophagus in two different Iraqi birds (Columba palumbus and Tyto alba). International Journal of Advanced Research in Biological Sciences, 2(12), 188–199.

Casteleyn, D., Doom, M., Lambrechts, E., Van den Broeck, W., Simoens, P., & Cornillie P. (2010). Locations of gut associated lymphoid tissue in the 3-month-old chicken: A review. Avian Pathology, 39(3), 143–150.

Cesta, M. F. (2006). Normal structure, function, and histology of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue. Toxicologic Pathology, 34, 599–608.

Ciriaco, E., Perez Pinera, P., Díaz-Esnal, B., & Laurà, R. (2003). Age-related changes in the avian primary lymphoid organs (thymus and bursa of Fabricius). Microscopy Research and Technique, 62(6), 482‒487.

Davison, F. (2014). The importance of the avian immune system and its unique features. In: Schat, K. A., Kaspers, B., & Kaiser, P. (Eds). Avian Immunolоgy. Academic Press, London. Pp. 1–9.

Dishluk, N. V. (2010). Rozvytok stravokhidnoho myhdalyka kurey u postnatal’nomu periodi ontohenezu [Development of esophageal tonsils of chickens in the postnatal period of ontogeny]. Visnyk Dnipropetrovs’koho Derzhavnoho Ahrarnoho Universytetu, 1, 115–118 (in Ukrainian).

Dishluk, N. V., & Orlova, A. V. (2017). Osoblyvosti budovy stravokhodu ta yoho imunnykh utvoren’ perepeliv [Structure’s features of esophagus and it’s immune formations of quails]. Scientific Messenger of Lviv National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies named after S. Z. Gzhytskyj, 77(19), 3–6 (in Ukrainian).

Dishlyuk, N. V. (2018). Makrostruktura stravokhidnoho myhdalyka vaktsynovanykh kurey [Macrostructure of esophageal tonsils of vaccinated chickens]. Naukovyy Visnyk Natsional’noho Universytetu Bioresursiv i Pryrodokorystuvannya Ukrayiny, 293, 52–57 (in Ukrainian).

Doneley, B. (2016). Avian medicine and surgery in practice: Companion and aviary birds. Second Edition. CRC Press.

Fellah, J. S., Jaffredo, T., Nagy, N., & Dunon, D. (2014). Development of the avian immune system. In: Schat, K. A., Kaspers, B., & Kaiser, P. (Eds.). Avian immunolоgy. Academic Press, London. Pp. 45‒63.

Friedman, A., Bar-Shira, E., & Sklan, D. (2003). Ontogeny of gut associated immune competence in the chick. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 59(2), 209‒219.

Goralsky, L. P., Khomich, V. T., & Kononsky, O. I. (2011). Osnovy gistologichnoji tekhniky i morfofunctsionalni doslidzhennia u normi ta pry patologiji [Basics of hіstologіcal technіques and morphofunctіonal methods of research in the norma and pathology]. Polissya, Zhytomyr (in Ukrainian).

Gritsenko, A. I. (1966). Gistostrukturnye osobennosti organov pishchevaritel’noj sitemy indejek pod konets embriogeneza i na rannikh etapakh postembrional’nogo ontoneneza [Histostructural features of the organs of the digestive system of turkeys at the end of embryogenesis and at different periods of postembryonic ontogenesis]. Kharkiv (in Ukrainian).

Jeurissen, S. H. M., Janse E. M., Koch, G., & De Boer, G. F. (1989). Postnatal development of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissues in chickens. Cell and Tissue Research, 258, 119–124.

Junior, A. F., Santos, J. P., Sousa, I. O., Martin, I., Alves, E. G. L., & Rosado, I. R. (2018). Gallus gallus domesticus: Immune system and its potential for generation of immunobiologics. Ciеncia Rural, 48(8), 1‒8.

Kaspers, B., & Göbel, T. W. F. (2016). The avian immune system. In: Ratcliffe, M. J. H. (Ed). Encyclopedia of immunobiology, 1. Elsevier Ltd. Pp. 498–503.

Kendall, M. D. (1980). Avian thymus gland: A review. Developmental and Comparative Immunology, 4, 191–209.

Kharchenko, L. P., & Lykova, I. A. (2013). Limfoyidni struktury travnoho traktu kulykiv (Charadrii) [Lymphoid structures of the waders’ (Charadrii) digestive tract]. Visnyk Kharkivs’koho Natsional’noho Universytetu imeni V. N. Karazina, 1056, 123–130 (in Ukrainian).

Khomych, V. T., & Usenko, S. I. (2013). Morfolohiya stravokhidnoho myhdalyka kachok vikom vid 25 do 120 dib [The morphology of the esophageal tonsil of ducks from 25 to 120 days]. Naukovyy Visnyk Natsional’noho Universytetu Bioresursiv i Pryrodokorystuvannya Ukrayiny, 188(2), 193–197 (in Ukrainian).

Korver, D. R. (2006). Overview of the immune dynamics of the digestive system. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 15(1), 123–135.

Koutsos, E. A., & Klasing, K. C. (2014). Factors modulating the avian immune system. In: Schat, K. A., Kaspers, B., & Kaiser, P. (Eds.). Avian Immunolоgy. Academic Press, London. Pp. 299–313.

Kovtun, M. F., & Kharchenko, L. P. (2005). Limfoidnyye obrazovaniya pishchevaritel’noy trubki ptits: Kharakteristika i biologicheskoye znacheniye [Lymphoid formations of the digestive tube of birds: Characteristics and biological significance]. Vestnik Zoologii, 39(6), 51–60 (in Ukrainian).

Lyashchinskiy, L. S., & Usenko, S. I. (2019). Morfologiya pishchevodnoy mindaliny yaponskogo perepela [Morphology of the esophageal tonsil of Japanese quail]. Sovremennyye Problemy i Perspektivy Issledovaniy v Anatomii i Gistologii Zhivotnykh, 2019, 57–59 (in Russian).

Nagy, N., Igyártó, B., Magyar, A., Gazdag E., Palya, V., & Olah, L. (2005). Oesophageal tonsil of the chicken. Acta Veterinaria Hungarica, 53(2), 173–188.

Nasrin, M., Siddiqi, M. N. H., Masum, M. A., & Wares, M. A. (2012). Gross and histological studies of digestive tract of broilers during postnatal growth and development. Journal of the Bangladesh Agricultural University, 10(1), 69–77.

Nochi, Т., Jansen, С. А., Toyomizu, М., & Eden, W. (2018) The well-developed mucosal immune systems of birds and mammals allow for similar approaches of mucosal vaccination in both types of animals. Frontiers in Nutrition, 5, 60–65.

Oláh, I., Nagy, N., Magyar, A., & Palya, V. (2003). Esophageal tonsil: A novel gut-associated lymphoid organ. Poultry Science, 82, 767–770.

Ruddle, N. H., & Akirav, E. M. (2009). Secondary lymphoid organs: Responding to genetic and environmental gues in ontogeny and the immune response. The Journal of Immunology, 183(4), 2205–2212.

Samour, J. (2015) Avian medicine. 3rd edition. Mosby Ltd.

Sapin, M. R., & Etingen, L. E. (1996). Immunnaya sistema cheloveka [The human immune system]. Medicine, Moscow (in Russian).

Sharma, J. M. (1991). Overview of the avian immune system. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, 30(1), 13–17.

Stojanovskyj, V., Garmata, L., & Kolomijets, I. (2016). Funktsionuvannya imunnoyi systemy perepeliv v rizni periody postnatal’noho ontohenezu [Function of quail immune system at different periods of postnatal ontogenesis]. Scientific Messenger of Lviv National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies named after S. Z. Gzhytskyj, 70, 36–39 (in Ukrainian).

Vakhhab, S. A., & Bushukina, O. S. (2017). Sravnitel’naya otsenka gistogeneza zheludka kur krossov ROSS-308 i Kheyseks Braun [Comparative assessment of histogenesis of stomach of chickencrosses ROSS-308 and Haysex Brown]. Agrarnyy Nauchnyy Zhurnal, 4, 11–15 (in Russian).

Vlasov, A. I., Yelsukov, K. A., & Kosolapov, I. A. (2011). Elektronnaya mikroskopiya [Electron microscopy]. MGTU im. Baumana, Moscow (in Russian).

Published
2020-04-22
How to Cite
KhomichV. Т., UsenkoS. І., & Dyshliuk, N. V. (2020). Morphofunctional features of the esophageal tonsil in some wild and domestic bird species . Regulatory Mechanisms in Biosystems, 11(2), 207-213. https://doi.org/10.15421/022030