Yield stability, ecological plasticity and spike productivity reveal adaptive strategies of winter wheat cultivars under hydrothermal variability

  • I. V. Havryliuk National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine
  • H. M. Kovalyshyna National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine
  • O. S. Makarchuk National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine
  • D. V. Litvinov National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine
  • R. S. Zhyla National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine
  • R. O. Spriazhka National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine
  • O. S. Havryliuk National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine
Keywords: winter wheat, Triticum aestivum, yield stability, ecological plasticity, genotype, homeostaticity, spike productivity, spike structure traits, adaptability.

Abstract

Climate variability increasingly affects winter wheat production by altering genotype × environment interactions and redu c ing the predictability of cultivar performance. Identifying cultivars that combine high yield, stability, ecological plasticity, and valuable spike productivity traits is therefore essential for sustainable wheat production under unstable hydrothermal conditions. This study evaluated grain yield, yield stability, ecological plasticity, homeostaticity, and main spike structure traits of 35 Ukrai n ian winter soft wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars grown in the Right-Bank Forest-Steppe of Ukraine during 2022–2024. Grain yield, coefficient of variation, ecological plasticity coefficient, homeostaticity index, spike rachis length, spike weight, number of spikelets per spike, number of grains per spike, and grain weight per spike were assessed using analysis of variance, correlation analysis, and cluster analysis. The study years differed markedly in hydrothermal conditions, providing a contrasting background for cultivar evaluation. Mean grain yield ranged from 508.4 to 661.7 g/m². The highest productivity was recorded for Tsarivna, Svitanok Myronivskyi, Vodohrai Bilotserkivskyi, Zorepad Bilotserkivska, Kraievyd, MIP Dniprianka, and Kvitka Poliv. Tsarivna and Vodohrai Bilotserkivskyi combined high yield with moderate interannual variability and a balanced ecolog i cal response, indicating broad adaptive value. Kesariia Poliska showed the highest homeostaticity and the lowest yield variability, while Romantyka combined stable yield expression with stable spike structure traits. Grain yield was mainly influenced by year and cultivar × year interaction. Correlation analysis revealed strong positive relationships among spike structure traits, particularly between grain number per spike and grain weight per spike, whereas their associations with mean yield were weaker. Cluster analysis distinguished cultivars with different adaptive strategies. The results demonstrate that winter wheat cultivar value cannot be reliably assessed by mean yield alone.

References

Al-Ashkar, I., Sallam, M., Almutairi, K. F., Shady, M., Ibrahim, A., & Alghamdi, S. S. (2023). Detection of high-performance wheat genotypes and genetic stability to determine complex interplay between genotypes and environments. Agronomy, 13(2), 585.

Altman, D. G., & Bland, J. M. (2005). Standard deviations and standard errors. British Medical Journal, 331(7521), 903–903.

Beillouin, D., Schauberger, B., Bastos, A., Ciais, P., & Makowski, D. (2020). Impact of extreme weather conditions on European crop production in 2018. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 375(1810), e20190510.

Bulygin, S., Kucher, L., Panchuk, Т., Kava, L., Moroz, S., Havryliuk, O., Yevchenko, O., Honchar, M., Retman, M., & Melnychuk, F. (2025). The effectiveness of agrotechnical anti-erosion measures on sloping soils in the conditions of the forest-steppe of Ukraine. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 26(8), 174–186.

Butenko, A., Litvinov, D., Borys, N., Litvinova, O., Masyk, I., Onychko, V., & Kharchenko, S. (2020). The typicality of hydrothermal conditions of the Forest Steppe and their influence on the productivity of crops. Environmental Research, Engineering and Management, 76(3), 84–95.

Dehodiuk, S., Davydiuk, H., Klymenko, I., Butenko, A., Litvinova, O., Tonkha, O., Havryliuk, O., & Litvinov, D. (2024). Agroecological monitoring of water ecosystems and soils in the basin of a small river under the influence of anthropogenic factors. Agriculture and Forestry, 70(4), 109–135.

Demydov, O. A., Kyrylenko, V. V., Murashko, L. A., Humenyuk, O. V., Suddenko, Y. M., Mukha, T. I., & Mazurenko, B. O. (2024). Breeding and genetic screening of F1 hybrids of soft winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) by manifestation of resistance to Fusarium graminearum Schwabe. Agronomy Research, 22(1), 96–109.

Dimitrov, E., Uhr, Z., & Chipilski, R. (2022). Study of yield and stability by common winter wheat varieties by changing climatic conditions in Sadovo Region. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 28(2), 271–278.

Gaju, O., Reynolds, M. P., Sparkes, D. L., & Foulkes, M. J. (2009). Relationships between large-spike phenotype, grain number, and yield potential in spring wheat. Crop Science, 49(3), 961–973.

Gupta, V., Kumar, M., Singh, V., Chaudhary, L., Yashveer, S., Sheoran, R., & Nagpal, S. (2022). Genotype by environment interaction analysis for grain yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum (L.) em. Thell) genotypes. Agriculture, 12(7), e1002.

Hadasch, S., Laidig, F., Macholdt, J., Bönecke, E., & Piepho, H. P. (2020). Trends in mean performance and stability of winter wheat and winter rye yields in a long-term series of variety trials. Field Crops Research, 252, e107792.

Havryliuk, I., & Kovalyshyna, H. (2024). Characteristics of soft winter wheat varieties by crop structure and grain quality indicators. Ukrainian Black Sea Region Agrarian Science, 28(4), 68–84.

Havryliuk, I., & Kovalyshyna, H. (2025). Analysis of soft winter wheat hybrids for main morphological and productive traits of the ear. Scientific Reports of the National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 21(2), 9–23.

Holyk, L., Havryliuk, I., Levchenko, O., Shtakal, M., Symonenko, N., Oksymets, O., Havryliuk, O., & Tarasenko, O. (2026). Yield stability and adaptive potential of winter wheat cultivars under climate variability in the Right-Bank Forest-Steppe of Ukraine. Agrology, 9(2), 76–82.

Kucek, L. K., Santantonio, N., Gauch, H. G., Dawson, J. C., Mallory, E. B., Darby, H. M., & Sorrells, M. E. (2019). Genotype × environment interactions and stability in organic wheat. Crop Science, 59(1), 25–32.

Litvinova, O., Dehodiuk, S., Litvinov, D., Havryliuk, O., Kyrychenko, A., Borys, N., & Dmytrenko, O. (2023a). Efficiency of technology elements for growing winter wheat on typical chernozem. Agronomy Research, 21(3), 1199–1212.

Litvinova, O., Tonkha, O., Havryliuk, O., Litvinov, D., Symochko, L., Dehodiuk, S., & Zhyla, R. (2023b). Fertilizers and pesticides impact on surface-active substances accumulation in the dark gray podzolic soils. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 24(7), 119–127.

Lopes, M. S., Royo, C., Alvaro, F., Sanchez-Garcia, M., Ozer, E., Ozdemir, F., Karaman, M., Roustaii, M., Jalal-Kamali, M. R., Pequeno, D. N. L., & Reynolds, M. P. (2018). Optimizing winter wheat resilience to climate change in rainfed crop systems of Turkey and Iran. Frontiers in Plant Science, 9, e563.

Mądry, W., Gacek, E., Paderewski, J., Gozdowski, D., & Drzazga, T. (2012). Adaptive yield response of winter wheat cultivars across environments in Poland using combined AMMI and. International Journal of Plant Production, 5(3), 299–310.

Mazurenko, B., Sani, M. N. H., Litvinov, D., Kalenska, S., Kovalenko, V., Shpakovych, I., Pikovska, O., Gordienko, L., Yong, H., Ghaley, B., & Tonkha, O. (2025). Biostimulants-induced improvements in pea-barley intercropping systems: A study of biomass and yield optimization under Ukrainian climatic conditions. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 22, e102074.

Mohammadi, R., Haghparast, R., Amri, A., & Ceccarelli, S. (2009). Yield stability of rainfed durum wheat and GGE biplot analysis of multi-environment trials. Crop and Pasture Science, 61(1), 92–101.

Mohammadi, R., Jafarzadeh, J., Armion, M., Hatamzadeh, H., & Roohi, E. (2023). Clustering stability methods towards selecting best performing and stable durum wheat genotypes. Euphytica, 219(10), e109.

Morgounov, A., Haun, S., Lang, L., Martynov, S., & Sonder, K. (2013). Climate change at winter wheat breeding sites in Central Asia, Eastern Europe, and USA, and implications for breeding. Euphytica, 194(2), 277–292.

Naheed, H., Rahman, H. U., Khan, N., Rahman, A. U., Amri, M., & Sohail, Q. (2026). Additive main effect and multiplicative interaction analysis for agronomic performances in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) advanced lines across multiple environments. Euphytica, 222(6), e93.

Pavlichenko, A., Dmytrenko, O., Litvinova, O., Kovalova, S., Litvinov, D., Havryliuk, O. (2023). Changes in gray forest soil organic matter pools under anthropogenic load in agrocenoses. Agronomy Research, 21(3), 1266–1277.

Philipp, N., Weichert, H., Bohra, U., Weschke, W., Schulthess, A. W., & Weber, H. (2018). Grain number and grain yield distribution along the spike remain stable despite breeding for high yield in winter wheat. PLoS One, 13(10), e0205452.

Shiferaw, B., Smale, M., Braun, H. J., Duveiller, E., Reynolds, M., & Muricho, G. (2013). Crops that feed the world 10. Past successes and future challenges to the role played by wheat in global food security. Food Security, 5(3), 291–317.

Shtakal, M., Holyk, L., Levchenko O., Shpakovych, I., & Ivashchenko, S. (2022). Otsiniuvannia sortiv i liniy pshenytsi ozymoyi za stabilnoyu vrozhainistiu ta adaptyvnistiu v umovakh zminy klimatu Lisostepu [Assessment of winter wheat varieties and lines for stable yield and adaptability in the conditions of Forest-Steppe climate change]. Bulletin of Agricultural Science, 100(3), 62–69 (in Ukrainian).

Tsenov, N., Gubatov, T., & Yanchev, I. (2020). Correlations between grain yield and related traits in winter wheat under multi-environmental traits. Agricultural Science and Technology, 12(4), 265–300.

Vicentin, L., Canales, J., & Calderini, D. F. (2024). The trade-off between grain weight and grain number in wheat is explained by the overlapping of the key phases determining these major yield components. Frontiers in Plant Science, 15, e1380429.

Würschum, T., Leiser, W. L., Langer, S. M., Tucker, M. R., & Longin, C. F. H. (2018). Phenotypic and genetic analysis of spike and kernel characteristics in wheat reveals long-term genetic trends of grain yield components. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 131(10), 2071–2084.

Xie, Q., & Sparkes, D. L. (2021). Dissecting the trade-off of grain number and size in wheat. Planta, 254(1), e3.

Xiong, W., Reynolds, M. P., Crossa, J., Schulthess, U., Sonder, K., Montes, C., Addimando, N., Singh, R. P., Ammar, K., Gerard, B., & Payne, T. (2021). Increased ranking change in wheat breeding under climate change. Nature Plants, 7(9), 1207–1212.

Published
2026-06-05
How to Cite
Havryliuk, I. V., Kovalyshyna, H. M., Makarchuk, O. S., Litvinov, D. V., Zhyla, R. S., Spriazhka, R. O., & Havryliuk, O. S. (2026). Yield stability, ecological plasticity and spike productivity reveal adaptive strategies of winter wheat cultivars under hydrothermal variability. Regulatory Mechanisms in Biosystems, 17(5), e26092. https://doi.org/10.15421/0226092