Dynamics of skin scar formation as a subject of forensic veterinary examination
Abstract
The study examines the morphological, histological, ultrasonographic , and luminescent characteristics of skin scars in dogs and cats caused by stabbing and cutting instruments, analyzed dynamically throughout the wound healing pr o cess. It is demo n strated that skin scars possess clearly defined features that vary depending on the duration of scar tissue formation and can be used for the approximate determination of the age of injury. It was established that the process of scar formation proceeds through sequential stages of inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling, which are characte r ized by specific histomorphological patterns, including changes in cellular composition, organization of collagen fibers, and restoration of skin appendages. Histological studies showed that already at the early stages (days 8–12), active r e generation of the dermis, epidermis, and skin appenda g es occurs within the scar area, accompanied by high fibroblast activity and the formation of a collagen matrix. However, at later stages (days 21–25), scar tissue acquires a microscopic structure that closely a p proximates that of intact skin. This enables an objective assessment of the stages and completion of the healing process and, consequently, the determination of the age of injury, which constitutes the subject of forensic veterinary examination. Examination of skin scars under ultraviolet radiation on day 14 allows the detection of weakly expressed or absent fluorescence of scar tissue, which is due to the insufficient accumul a tion of mature collagen, despite the already relatively ordered orientation of collagen bundles. Wound healing in dogs occurs more rapidly and intensiv e ly than in cats, which is manifested by a more pronounced inflammatory response, more active neoangiogenesis , higher fibroblastic activity, and faster remodeling of scar tissue. An author-developed classification of skin scars, comprising 17 criteria, was created and formed the basis for forensic veterinary analysis aimed at assessing their impact on exterior disfigurement and mutilation of animals, as well as influencing the formulation of an accurate and comprehensive fore n sic veterinary diagnosis. The practical significance of the study lies in substantiating the objectives of forensic veterinary exam i nations of animals injured by sharp objects, particularly in the possibility of using a complex of macroscopic, histological, ultrasonographic , and lum i nescent scar features to establish the mechanism of trauma, the approximate age of injury, and to assess the degree of trauma-induced morphological and functional disorders in the organism.References
de Siqueira, A., Cuevas, S. E., Salvagni, F. A., & Maiorka, P. C. (2016). Forensic veterinary pathology: Sharp injuries in animals. Veterinary Pathology, 53(5), 979–987.
Deng, F., Yang, R., Yang, Y, Li, X., Hou, J, Liu, Y., Lu, J., Huangfu, S., Meng, Y., Wu, S., & Zhang, L. (2024). Visible light accelerates skin wound healing and alleviates scar formation in mice by adjusting STAT3 signaling. Communications Biology, 7(1), 1266.
Fox, M. (2024). Ethical and legal issues around 'animal personhood'. Veterinary Record, 195(1), 36–37.
Ghosh, B., Mandal, M., Mitra, P., & Chatterjee, J. (2021). Attenuation corrected-optical coherence tomography for quantitative assessment of skin wound healing and scar morphology. Journal of Biophotonics, 14(4), e202000357.
Ghosh, B., Mandal, M., Mitra, P., & Chatterjee, J. (2021). Structural mechanics modeling reveals stress-adaptive features of cutaneous scars. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, 20(1), 371–377.
Han, C., Leonardo, T. R., Romana-Souza, B., Shi, J., Keiser, S., Yuan, H., Altakriti, M., Ranzer, M. J., Ferri-Borgogno, S., Mok, S. C., Koh, T. J., Hong, S. J., Chen, L., & DiPietro, L. A. (2023). Microfibril-associated protein 5 and the regulation of skin scar formation. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 8728.
Jiang, D., & Rinkevich, Y. (2020). Scars or regeneration? – Dermal fibroblasts as drivers of diverse skin wound responses. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(2), 617.
Jiang, D., & Rinkevich, Y. (2021). Distinct fibroblasts in scars and regeneration. Current Opinion in Genetics and Development, 70, 7–14.
Jiang, D., Christ, S., Correa-Gallegos, D., Ramesh, P., Kalgudde Gopal, S., Wannemacher, J., Mayr, C. H., Lupperger, V., Yu, Q., Ye, H., Mück-Häusl, M., Rajendran, V., Wan, L., Liu, J., Mirastschijski, U., Volz, T., Marr, C., Schiller, H. B., & Rinkevich, Y. (2020). Injury triggers fascia fibroblast collective cell migration to drive scar formation through N-cadherin. Nature Communications, 11(1), 5653.
Kawakami, H., Nishizawa, S., Hikita, A., & Hoshi, K. (2021). Histochemical and morphometrical analyses of scarless wound healing in mouse fetal model. Tokai Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, 46(1), 33–43.
Kohlhauser, M., Mayrhofer, M., Kamolz, L. P., & Smolle, C. (2024). An update on molecular mechanisms of scarring – A narrative review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(21), 11579.
Kuan, C. H., Tai, K. Y., Lu, S. C., Wu, Y. F., Wu, P. S., Kwang, N., Wang, W. H., Mai-Yi Fan, S., Wang, S. H., Chien, H. F., Lai, H. S., Lin, M. H., Plikus, M. V., & Lin, S. J. (2024). Delayed collagen production without myofibroblast formation contributes to reduced scarring in adult skin microwounds. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 144(5), 1124–1133.
Kussie, H. C., Yasmeh, J. P., Stevens, B., Fischer, K. S., Granoski, M. B., McKenna, E., Mora Pinos, M. G., Saenz, F., Jafri, M., Hostler, A. C., Chen, K., & Gurtner, G. C. (2024). A mouse model of mechanotransduction-driven, human-like hypertrophic scarring. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 213, e67156.
Lin, Z., Han, X., Zhang, M., Xu, J., Li, H., Zhou, J., & Xie, H. (2022). Aspirin inhibits the growth of hypertrophic scar in rabbit ears via regulating Wnt/β-catenin signal pathway. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban, 47(6), 698–706.
Lux, C. N. (2022). Wound healing in animals: a review of physiology and clinical evaluation. Veterinary Dermatology, 33(1), 91-e27.
Mascharak, S., Griffin, M., Talbott, H. E., Guo, J. L., Parker, J., Morgan, A. G., Valencia, C., Kuhnert, M. M., Li, D. J., Liang, N. E., Kratofil, R. M., Daccache, J. A., Sidhu, I., Davitt, M. F., Guardino, N., Lu, J. M., Abbas, D. B., Deleon, N. M. D., Lavin, C. V., Adem, S., Khan, A., Chen, K., Henn, D., Spielman, A., Cotterell, A., Akras, D., Downer Jr., M., Tevlin, R., Lorenz, H. P., Gurtner, G. C., Januszyk, M., Naik, S., Wan, D. C., Longaker, M. T. (2025). Inhibiting mechanotransduction prevents scarring and yields regeneration in a large animal model. Science Translational Medicine, 17(786), eadt6387.
Meikle, B., Simons, M., Mahoney, T., Reddan, T., Dai, B., Kimble, R. M., & Tyack, Z. (2024). Ultrasound measurement of traumatic scar and skin thickness: A scoping review of evidence across the translational pipeline of research-to-practice. BMJ Open, 14(4), e078361.
Mistry, R., Veres, M., & Issa, F. (2022). A systematic review comparing animal and human scarring models. Frontiers in Surgery, 9, 711094.
Nabai, L., Pourghadiri, A., & Ghahary, A. (2020). Hypertrophic scarring: Current knowledge of predisposing factors, cellular and molecular mechanisms. Journal of Burn Care and Research, 41(1), 48–56.
Neves, L. M. G., Wilgus, T. A., & Bayat, A. (2023). In vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo approaches for investigation of skin scarring: Human and animal models. Advances in Wound Care, 12(2), 97–116.
Nischwitz, S. P., Fink, J., Schellnegger, M., Luze, H., Bubalo, V., Tetyczka, C., Roblegg, E., Holecek, C., Zacharias, M., Kamolz, L.P., & Kotzbeck, P. (2022). The role of local inflammation and hypoxia in the formation of hypertrophic scars – A new model in the duroc pig. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(1), 316.
Parry, N. M. A., & Stoll, A. (2020). The rise of veterinary forensics. Forensic Science International, 306, 110069.
Piegari, G., d'Aquino, I., Salanti, G. V., Romano, V., Miletti, G., Sannino, E., Di Napoli, E., Riccio, L., De Biase, D., & Paciello, O. (2024). Pathological changes and sodium rhodizonate test as tools for investigating gunshot wounds in veterinary forensic pathology. Animals, 14(19), 2913.
Ramesh, P., Ye, H., Dasgupta, B., Machens, H. G., & Rinkevich, Y. (2022). Visualizing scar development using SCAD assay – An ex-situ skin scarring assay. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 182, e63808.
Rayner, E., Airikkala-Otter, I., Susheelan, A., Gibson, A., Itaba, R., Mayani, T., Mellanby, R. J., & Gamble, L. (2020). Prevalence of skin wounds in working donkeys in Bukombe, Tanzania. Veterinary Record, 186(9), 284.
Rippa, A. L., Kalabusheva, E. P., & Vorotelyak, E. A. (2019). Regeneration of dermis: Scarring and cells involved. Cells, 8(6), 607.
Short, W. D., Wang, X., Li, H., Yu, L., Kaul, A., Calderon, G. A., Gilley, J., Bollyky, P. L., Balaji, S., & Keswani, S. G. (2021). Interleukin-10 producing T lymphocytes attenuate dermal scarring. Annals of Surgery, 274(4), 627–636.
Sinmez, C. C., Aykun, A. İ., & Cengiz, R. S. (2024). A retrospective study of pet owners' complaints against veterinary practices in Türkiye (2012–2021). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 262(9), 1–8.
Smith, L. M., Quinnell, R., Munteanu, A., Hartmann, S., Dalla Villa, P., & Collins, L. (2022). Attitudes towards free-roaming dogs and dog ownership practices in Bulgaria, Italy, and Ukraine. PLoS One, 17(3), e0252368.
Supp, D. M. (2019). Animal models for studies of keloid scarring. Advanced Wound Care, 8(2), 77–89.
Szlachcikowska, D., Mazurek, K., Magiera, M., Jama, G., & Tabęcka-Łonczyńska, A. (2025). Current insights and future directions in scar management and skin regeneration. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(21), 10636.
Wang, Z. C., Zhao, W. Y., Cao, Y., Liu, Y. Q., Sun, Q., Shi, P., Cai, J. Q., Shen, X. Z., & Tan, W. Q. (2020). The roles of inflammation in keloid and hypertrophic scars. Frontiers in Immunology, 11, 603187.
Yatsenko, I. (2024). Paradyhma sudovo-veterynarnoyi ekspertyzy [Forensic veterinary examination]. ISE im. Zasl. Prof. M. S. Bokariusa, Kharkiv (in Ukrainian).
Yatsenko, I. V., & Kozachok, V. V. (2024). Praktyka sudovo-veterynarnoyi ekspertyzy za ushkodzhen’ tvaryn hostrymy predmetamy [Forensic veterinary practice for injuries to animals caused by sharp objects]. Visnyk Sums’koho Natsional’noho Ahrarnoho Universytetu, Seriya “Veterynarna Medytsyna”, 67, 116–130 (in Ukrainian).
Yatsenko, I., Smirnov, O., & Kozachok, V. (2025). Forensic veterinary examination of animal bodies injured by glass fragments WHERE IS ORIGINAL TITLE IN UKRAINIAN ? [Forensic veterinary examination of carcasses of animals injured by glass fragments]. Ukrainian Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 16(1), 40–58 (in Ukrainian).
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons «Attribution» 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
