Effects of fracture type, bone mineral density, and surgical technique on clinical outcomes of proximal humeral fracture surgery
Abstract
As the proportion of elderly individuals in Ukraine’s population rises, optimizing the treatment of proximal humeral fra c tures is becoming increasingly important, given their significant impact on quality of life. Surgical treatment was performed using one of three methods in three patient groups (aged 45–78 years, total n = 102) with reduced bone mineral density fo l lowing a three- or four-fragment proximal humerus fracture: open reduction and internal fixation with a proximal humeral locking plate with angular stability; open reduction and internal fixation with a plate using 3D-printed porous polylactide implants; primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using an advanced endoprosthesis or porous elements made from tit a nium powder via 3D printing and novel friction pairs. The Constant-Murley Score was used to evaluate functional outcomes at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Functional outcomes were analyzed based on individual preoperative parameters, treatment methods, and the presence of complications to identify risk factors for poor functional outcomes within 12 months postoperatively. At each follow-up period (3, 6, and 12 months), no statistically significant differences in mean Constant-Murley Score values were observed based on sex, age, or time between trauma and surgery. It was established that functional treatment outcomes showed a positive trend across all analyzed subgroups as the postoperative period increased from 3 to 12 months. Fracture type, cortical index value, and the presence of postoperative complications were the primary factors influe n cing functional outcomes in the studied sample. At all follow-up stages (3, 6, and 12 months), patients with four-fragment fractures had worse functional outcomes than those with three-fragment fractures. Similarly, patients with a cortical index value ≤ 0.36 demonstrated poorer outcomes than those with values of 0.38–0.40, as did patients with postoperative complic a tions compared to those without. The presence of a four -fragment fracture and a cortical index ≤ 0.36 in patients aged 55–78 years in the studied sample may be considered risk factors for an unsatisfactory functional outcome within 12 months postop e ratively. To determine both qualitative and quantitative relationships between initial patient conditions and functional ou t comes over time, further studies are required in larger patient groups. Specifically, reverse prosthetics may offer a more a d vanced solution for older individuals with reduced bone density in cases of three- and f our -fragment fractures, necessitating a longer follow-up period.References
Barlow, J. D., Logli, A. L., Steinmann, S. P., Sems, S. A., Cross, W. W., Yuan, B. J., Torchia, M. E., & Sanchez-Sotelo, J. (2020). Locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures in patients older than 60 years continues to be associated with a high complication rate. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 29(8), 1689–1694.
Chelli, M., Levy, Y., Lavoué, V., Clowez, G., Gonzalez, J.-F., & Boileau, P. (2019). The “auto-constant”: Can we estimate the Constant-Murley score with a self-administered questionnaire? A pilot study. Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Surgery and Research, 105(2), 251–256.
Constant, C. R., & Murley, A. H. (1987). A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, (214), 160–164.
Czarnecki, P., Falis, M., Bonczar, M., Ostrowski, P., Wcisłek, J., & Romanowski, L. (2024). Assessing complications and functional outcomes in proxymal humerus fracture management: A retrospective comparison between conservative and intramedullary nailing treatments. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology: Orthopedie Traumatologie, 34(3), 1427–1433.
den Teuling, J. W. A. M., Pauwels, B. S., Janssen, L., Wyers, C. E., Janzing, H. M. J., van den Bergh, J. P. W., & Morrenhof, J. W. (2017). The influence of bone mineral density and cortical index on the complexity of fractures of the proximal humerus. Bone and Joint Research, 6(10), 584–589.
Dolci, A., Melis, B., Verona, M., Capone, A., & Marongiu, G. (2021). Complications and intraoperative fractures in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: A systematic review. Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, 12, 21514593211059865.
Du, S., Ye, J., Chen, H., Li, X., & Lin, Q. (2017). Interventions for treating 3- or 4-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patient: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. International Journal of Surgery, 48, 240–246.
Gupta, P., Marigi, E. M., & Sanchez-Sotelo, J. (2023). Research on artificial intelligence in shoulder and elbow surgery is increasing. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery International, 7(1), 158–161.
Iglesias-Rodríguez, S., Domínguez-Prado, D. M., García-Reza, A., Fernández-Fernández, D., Pérez-Alfonso, E., García-Piñeiro, J., & Castro-Menéndez, M. (2021). Epidemiology of proximal humerus fractures. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 16(1), 402.
Karimi, A. H., Langberg, J., Malige, A., Rahman, O., Abboud, J. A., & Stone, M. A. (2024). Accuracy of machine learning to predict the outcomes of shoulder arthroplasty: A systematic review. Arthroplasty, 6(1), 26.
Korzh, M., Makarov, V., Gupalov, I., Pertseva, O., Boyko, K., & Pidgaiska, O. (2023). Results of a differential approach to surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures in patients with osteoporosis. Orthopaedics, Traumatology and Prosthetics, 3–4, 13–21.
Kumar, V., Allen, C., Overman, S., Teredesai, A., Simovitch, R., Flurin, P.-H., Wright, T., Zuckerman, J., Routman, H., & Roche, C. (2022). Development of a predictive model for a machine learning – derived shoulder arthroplasty clinical outcome score. Seminars in Arthroplasty: Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 32(2), 226–237.
Kumar, V., Roche, C., Overman, S., Simovitch, R., Flurin, P. H., Wright, T., Zuckerman, J., Routman, H., & Teredesai, A. (2020). What is the accuracy of three different machine learning techniques to predict clinical outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty? Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 478(10), 2351–2363.
Kumar, V., Roche, C., Overman, S., Simovitch, R., Flurin, P.-H., Wright, T., Zuckerman, J., Routman, H., & Teredesai, A. (2021). Using machine learning to predict clinical outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty with a minimal feature set. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 30(5), e225–e236.
Larose, G., & Virk, M. S. (2022). The evolution of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty and its current use in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures in the older population. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(19), 5832.
Leino, O. K., Lehtimäki, K. K., Mäkelä, K., Äärimaa, V., & Ekman, E. (2022). Proximal humeral fractures in Finland: trends in the incidence and methods of treatment between 1997 and 2019. The Bone and Joint Journal, 104-B(1), 150–156.
Lin, C. C., Karlin, E., Boin, M. A., Dankert, J. F., Larose, G., Zuckerman, J. D., & Virk, M. S. (2022). Operative treatment of proximal humeral fractures with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients ≥65 years old: a critical analysis review. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. Reviews, 10(5), e21.00245.
Louwerens, J. K. G., van den Bekerom, M. P. J., van Royen, B. J., Eygendaal, D., van Noort, A., & Sierevelt, I. N. (2020). Quantifying the minimal and substantial clinical benefit of the Constant-Murley score and the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand score in patients with calcific tendinitis of the rotator cuff. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery International, 4(3), 606–611.
Malavolta, E. A., Assunção, J. H., Gracitelli, M. E. C., Simões, P. A. A., Shido, D. K., & Ferreira Neto, A. A. (2018). Correlation between the UCLA and Constant-Murley scores in rotator cuff repairs and proximal humeral fractures osteosynthesis. Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia, 53(4), 441–447.
Marongiu, G., Leinardi, L., Congia, S., Frigau, L., Mola, F., & Capone, A. (2020). Reliability and reproducibility of the new AO/OTA 2018 classification system for proximal humeral fractures: a comparison of three different classification systems. Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 21(1), 4.
McLean, A. S., Price, N., Graves, S., Hatton, A., & Taylor, F. J. (2019). Nationwide trends in management of proximal humeral fractures: An analysis of 77,966 cases from 2008 to 2017. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 28(11), 2072–2078.
McLendon, P. B., Christmas, K. N., Simon, P., Plummer, O. R., Hunt, A., Ahmed, A. S. Mighell, M. A., & Frankle, M. A. (2021). Machine learning can predict level of improvement in shoulder arthroplasty. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Open Access, 6(1), e20.00128.
Müller, M. E., Koch, P., Nazarian, S., & Schatzker, J. (2012). The comprehensive classification of fractures of long bones. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg.
Patel, A. H., Wilder, J. H., Ofa, S. A., Lee, O. C., Savoie, F. H., 3rd, O'Brien, M. J., & Sherman, W. F. (2021). Trending a decade of proximal humerus fracture management in older adults. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery International, 6(1), 137–143.
Pires Rodrigues, G. A., Vuistiner, P., Konzelmann, M., Léger, B., Burrus, C., & Luthi, F. (2018). Are psychological factors associated with the 4 components of the Constant–Murley score? Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 61, e140–e141.
Relvas Silva, M., Linhares, D., Leite, M. J., Nunes, B., Torres, J., Neves, N., & Ribeiro Silva, M. (2022). Proximal humerus fractures: epidemiology and trends in surgical management of hospital-admitted patients in Portugal. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery International, 6(3), 380–384.
Roche, C., Kumar, V., Overman, S., Simovitch, R., Flurin, P. H., Wright, T., Routman, H., Teredesai, A., & Zuckerman, J. (2021). Validation of a machine learning-derived clinical metric to quantify outcomes after total shoulder arthroplasty. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 30(10), 2211–2224.
Samborski, S. A., Haws, B. E., Karnyski, S., Soles, G., Gorczyca, J. T., Nicandri, G., Voloshin, I., & Ketz, J. P. (2022). Outcomes for type C proximal humerus fractures in the adult population: comparison of nonoperative treatment, locked plate fixation, and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery International, 6(5), 755–762.
Vall, M., Natera, L., Witney-Lagen, C., Imam, M. A., Narvani, A. A., Sforza, G., Levy, O., Relwani, J., & Consigliere, P. (2022). Reverse shoulder replacement versus hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture in elderly patients: A systematic review. Musculoskeletal Surgery, 106(4), 357–367.
Vrotsou, K., Ávila, M., Machón, M., Mateo-Abad, M., Pardo, Y., Garin, O., Zaror, C., González, N., Escobar, A., & Cuéllar, R. (2018). Constant–Murley Score: Systematic review and standardized valuation in different shoulder pathologies. Quality of Life Research, 27(9), 2217–2226.
Wendt, K. W., Jaeger, M., Verbruggen, J., Nijs, S., Oestern, H. J., Kdolsky, R., & Komadina, R. (2021). ESTES recommendations on proximal humerus fractures in the elderly. European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, 47(2), 381–395.
Xu, S., Chen, J. Y., Hao, Y., Chang, C. C. P., & Lie, D. T. T. (2020). Threshold scores for treatment success after arthroscopic bankart repair using Oxford Shoulder Instability Score, Constant-Murley Score, and UCLA shoulder score. Journal of Orthopaedics, 22, 242–245.
Yang, C., Yang, A. Z., Xu, S., Yew, A., & Lie, D. T. T. (2024). Determining patient acceptable symptom states from patient reported outcome measures following reverse shoulder arthroplasty: Constant-Murley, UCLA, Oxford Shoulder Scores. Journal of Orthopaedics, 54, 143–147.
Zheng, Y., Tang, N., Zhang, W. J., Shi, W., Zhao, W. W., & Yang, K. (2024). Comparative efficacy and safety of medical treatments for proximal humerus fractures: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 25(1), 17.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons «Attribution» 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.


